Suixuan

标签：Popper

The Politics and Jurisprudence Behind the Philosophy of Science

History of Science & Scholarship2008.01.21
The Politics and Jurisprudence Behind the Philosophy of Science
From Plato onward, from the “freedom” of ancient Greece to the “Enlightenment” of the modern era, the issues of philosophy of science and political philosophy have always been entangled, impossible to disentangle. By the time we reach the “official history” of twentieth-century philosophy of science, we see this especially clearly: from Popper’s liberalism to Kuhn’s “revolution” and then to Feyerabend’s anarchism, the development of philosophy of science was practically a debate in political philosophy. Looking back at the history of thought from ancient Greece to the Enlightenment, we can be certain that philosophers of science borrowing political terminology is by no means merely a coincidence or a metaphor. Ancient Greece…
science politics Kant Plato
阅读全文

2008年1月21日
Peddling Philosophy of Science and Technology (III)

History of Science & Scholarship2007.10.03
Peddling Philosophy of Science and Technology (III)
The previous two “sales pitches,” as my senior brother put it, attacked only and defended not at all. In fact, philosophy of science and technology of course has its fatal weaknesses. What I want to emphasize is that anyone “can,” “may as well,” and “might as well” do philosophy of science and technology; however, I have not said that it is the most suitable choice for everyone. In fact, if a certain kind of work can be done well by anyone, then it is probably mediocre. The advantage of philosophy of science and technology is precisely its most fatal flaw—being too miscellaneous. Philosophy of science and technology runs through all…
science philosophy of science Kuhn Wittgenstein
阅读全文

2007年10月3日
Kuhn’s Historicism as a Rebuttal to Popper’s Philosophy of History

History of Science & Scholarship2007.01.14
Kuhn’s Historicism as a Rebuttal to Popper’s Philosophy of History
Abstract: Based on the philosophy of science of “historicism,” represented by Kuhn, this article offers a critique of the scientific-philosophical foundations of Popper’s philosophy of history, and thereby of his anti-historicist philosophy of history. The author points out the close connection between Popper’s view of history and his view of science, and then, around the keywords “falsification,” “science,” “technology,” “wholeness,” “revolution,” and “history,” analyzes in turn the limitations and one-sidedness of Popper’s understanding of these concepts. Keywords: Popper historicism falsificationism Kuhn holism revolution Contents Introduction… 1 Falsification… 2 Science… 5 Technology… 7 Wholeness… 9 Revolution… 10 History… 13 Bibliography… 14 January 14, 2007, 2:30 a.m., at Yangroupaoju Introduction The title…
science paper Kuhn revolution
阅读全文

2007年1月14日
Draft of the First Three Parts of Popper’s Essay on the Philosophy of History

History of Science & Scholarship2006.10.26
Draft of the First Three Parts of Popper’s Essay on the Philosophy of History
Popper Popper… 0 Introduction… 0 What Is Falsification?… 2 What Is Science?… 4 What Is Technology?… 7 What Is Totality?… 8 What Is Revolution?… 9 What Is History?… 12 Other… 13 Bibliography… 16 Introduction Popper’s most influential, and at the same time most controversial, philosophical claims are, first, the doctrine of “falsificationism” in the philosophy of science, and second, the critique of “historicism” in the philosophy of history—or, rather, political philosophy. For Popper, the move from the philosophy of science to political philosophy is “internally consistent”: the philosophy of science is the starting point and foothold of Popper’s thought, and his views on the philosophy of history are in fact…
science philosophy of science Popper
阅读全文

2006年10月26日
The Philosophy of History Is Quite Interesting

Life & Notes2006.10.01
The Philosophy of History Is Quite Interesting
Inspired by an offhand suggestion from ZW, I thought of and chose the course “Popper’s Philosophy of History.” This course falls under the category of Marxist philosophy, but however the class may be taught, this topic is in itself well worth choosing for me. Popper is a very special philosopher. His primary identity is that of a philosopher of science, the founder of the so-called “falsificationism,” which is often paired with Kuhn’s historicism. He is also a liberal thinker of enormous influence, and moreover an important critic of Marx and Hegel. In philosophical circles, it would be more accurate to say that Popper is widely looked down upon than widely…
philosophy everyday life philosophy of science history
阅读全文

2006年10月1日
Noya Keiichi: “Kuhn—Paradigm”

History of Science & Scholarship2006.02.09
Noya Keiichi: “Kuhn—Paradigm”
[Japanese] Noya Keiichi: “Kuhn—Paradigm,” translated by Bi Xiaohui, proofread by Chen Huabei, Hebei Education Publishing House, January 2002 There are some books that one must read, cannot not read, books it is impossible to imagine not reading; for me, Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is a typical example. And yet I seem to have this lazy habit: since I will have to read it sooner or later, there is no harm in reading it a little later. And so, dragging it on, I still haven’t read it. Next semester I will officially begin studying philosophy of science, and the books that must be read have finally become impossible to…
book reading notes philosophy of science Scientific Revolution
阅读全文

2006年2月9日