“discussion”, page 3
Site MattersAdd Annotations to Any Paragraph: Enable the Feedback by Paragraph Plugin2011.02.20History of Science & ScholarshipCommunication and Chess2009.09.12
Life & NotesNotes from Today’s Xindao Salon 09-05-092009.05.09Philosophy & ThoughtRelationism and the Philosophy of Communication2009.03.24Philosophy & ThoughtOn Women Philosophers and the Top-Bottom Dichotomy2009.03.11History of Science & ScholarshipNew Island Dialogues, Zero: Cafés and Scholarship2009.03.07Site MattersWhy Do You Read or Not Read My Articles?2009.01.04Life & NotesDraft Program for an Old-School Philosophy2008.12.31History of Science & ScholarshipOn BBS’s Suitability for Academic Exchange: Online Forums Should Replace Academic Conferences2008.06.12Site MattersThe Inertia of the Bystander2008.02.21Philosophy & ThoughtWhat Logic Do We Use in Everyday Discussion?2008.02.18History of Science & Scholarship[Repost] Related Discussion on “Zhang Tiankan: For Maglev, We Must Persuade the Public with Scientific Evidence zz”2008.01.21
Life & NotesNotes from Today’s Xindao Salon 09-05-092009.05.09Philosophy & ThoughtRelationism and the Philosophy of Communication2009.03.24Philosophy & ThoughtOn Women Philosophers and the Top-Bottom Dichotomy2009.03.11History of Science & ScholarshipNew Island Dialogues, Zero: Cafés and Scholarship2009.03.07Site MattersWhy Do You Read or Not Read My Articles?2009.01.04Life & NotesDraft Program for an Old-School Philosophy2008.12.31History of Science & ScholarshipOn BBS’s Suitability for Academic Exchange: Online Forums Should Replace Academic Conferences2008.06.12Site MattersThe Inertia of the Bystander2008.02.21Philosophy & ThoughtWhat Logic Do We Use in Everyday Discussion?2008.02.18History of Science & Scholarship[Repost] Related Discussion on “Zhang Tiankan: For Maglev, We Must Persuade the Public with Scientific Evidence zz”2008.01.21