Suixuan

标签：Heidegger

The 7th Beijing Forum on Philosophy of Technology and the 48th Lecture of the Peking University Forum on History and Philosophy of Science and Technology

Philosophy & Thought2008.01.09
The 7th Beijing Forum on Philosophy of Technology and the 48th Lecture of the Peking University Forum on History and Philosophy of Science and Technology
The 7th Beijing Forum on Philosophy of Technology and the 48th Lecture of the Peking University Forum on History and Philosophy of Science and Technology (January 8, 2008) Time: Tuesday, January 8, 2008, 9:30–11:30 a.m. Venue: Academic Lecture Hall, Center for Social Sciences, Chengze Garden Speaker: Deng Bo (Professor, School of Humanities, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology) Topic: The Architect’s Original Ethical Responsibility Commentator: Wu Guosheng I listened to the recording. But listening to a recording really feels so much worse than listening in person; after listening, I found that it was hard to write a report like the ones I had written for the previous few sessions, so…
philosophy Heidegger Wu Guosheng
阅读全文

2008年1月9日
Words and Fragments, Episode 5

Philosophy & Thought2007.12.14
Words and Fragments, Episode 5
l In response to someone’s question about how to systematically grasp philosophy of technology: “The introduction to philosophy of technology is not difficult in one sense, because its field is so broad that in fact one can find a doorway into it from any side. Rather than, from the very beginning, pursuing a systematic and comprehensive grasp, it is better to try to identify a point of entry, find the clues, and then follow the vine to find the melon; in this way one can go deeper and deeper. You can begin with any issue you care about—whether it is a classic topic in the history of philosophy, or concern…
philosophy Heidegger language intentionality
阅读全文

2007年12月14日
A Third Path One Can Choose—An Interpretation of Feenberg’s Philosophy of Technology

History of Science & Scholarship2007.05.31
A Third Path One Can Choose—An Interpretation of Feenberg’s Philosophy of Technology
The Third Path That Can Be Chosen—An Interpretation of Feenberg’s Philosophy of Technology Introduction American philosopher of technology Andrew Feenberg is a representative of contemporary Western Marxist philosophy of technology. His critical theory of technology seeks to open up a “third path” in philosophy of technology—Feenberg hopes to carve out a new route between the traditional optimism and pessimism about technology, inheriting the critique and reflection on modern technology found in the Frankfurt School, Heidegger, Ellul, and other pessimists, while also retaining something of the utopian ideal found in Marx and in theorists of technology as a tool. Feenberg believes that he will “preserve the strengths of both theories while…
technology freedom Heidegger paper
阅读全文

2007年5月31日
In ordinary times, one should write more blog posts as an outlet

Site Matters2007.05.17
In ordinary times, one should write more blog posts as an outlet
Yesterday in the ontology seminar, we were chatting about writing academic papers. Lao Yang said that a certain junior female student’s homework papers — and, incidentally, mine too — contained a lot of personal, experiential material, and thus might seem very good and highly original to some teachers, while receiving very, very low grades from others (Lao Yang was definitely thinking of my grade in metaphysics class… ). On the other hand, there are some people who know how to write and produce papers that are proper and standard, and no matter which teacher reads them, they can still get a high score. That is indeed so. A good paper…
philosophy everyday life blog Heidegger
阅读全文

2007年5月17日
Kant and Husserl—Scattered Affinities from Reading the History of Philosophy

Life & Notes2005.12.21
Kant and Husserl—Scattered Affinities from Reading the History of Philosophy
The other day, in passing, I mentioned that I felt Kant was more worthy of looking up to than Nietzsche, and that Husserl seemed deeper than Heidegger. — This is a rough impression I have recently formed from reading the history of Western philosophy; I have not read much in the way of further specialized studies or original texts, and what I am talking about is only my first impression. Even with only a few superficial introductions, one can still gain at least a basic understanding of those philosophers’ thought. For example, even before I had read the Analects or the Mencius, I already had a strong liking for Confucius…
everyday life Heidegger Kant Schopenhauer
阅读全文

2005年12月21日